Funding Lasting Change in Communities (Part 1)

Resource Type: Audio Seminar || Speakers: Prue Brown & Mikael Karlstrom

Part 1 of this 2 part podcast begins by defining an “embedded funder” and examines the successes, challenges and the impact of funders who make a long-term, place-based and hands-on approach to funding community change.

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Take the Seminar!

Vibrant Communities believes that creating lasting community change requires a long-term, sustained effort, and a place-based approach from both the people creating the change and from the funders.  

In the Fall of 2007, participants in the Vibrant Communities Funders Network came together to learn about the concept of embedded funders. 

This podcast, the 1st of a two part series, begins by defining an “embedded funder” and examines the successes, challenges and the impact of funders who make a long-term, place-based and hands-on approach to funding community change. 

On this page, you'll find

Meet the Speakers 

Prue Brown - Prue Brown is a Chapin Hall Research Fellow. Based in New York City, her work focuses primarily on community change: how to understand and learn from it, and how to improve practice and policy to build communities that support children and families. 

Dr. Brown is the co-director of Chapin Hall's Program on Philanthropy and Community Change, an effort to build knowledge and stimulate learning for foundations and their partners working on community change. 

Before coming to Chapin Hall, she served as Deputy Director of the Urban Poverty Program at the Ford Foundation. She holds a PhD in Social Work and Psychology from the University of Michigan.             

To learn more about Prue and her work, click here.   

Mikael Karlstrom - Mikael Karlstrom is a socio-cultural anthropologist with research experience in East Africa on cultural identity and political culture.  He has been a researcher at Chapin Hall since 2004, with primary responsibility for the embedded philanthropy study during the past two years.

Mikael holds a doctorate in anthropology from the University of Chicago.

Back to top.

Chapin Hall Centre for Children 

The mission of the Chapin Hall is to build knowledge to serve children.  The centre was founded 20 years ago to provide evidence-based research to policy-makers and service providers.  

Chapin Hall became interested in philanthropy because of their desire to improve the lives of low-income children through community change. Their interest in embedded funders grew as their research led them to believe that better work was being done by smaller funders who were committed to the place where they worked, but few researchers were examining this kind of work.

Back to top.

The Experience of Embedded Funders 

What is an Embedded Funder? 

Embedded funders share four defining criteria:

  • They work in a particular community over an extended period of time.
  • They have direct relationships with a variety of community actors.
  • They view community relationships as key to their work. The relationships are not incidental - they are the primary way they accomplish their work.
  • They provide other supports beyond conventional grant-making, such as research, training and convening.

Lessons for Other Funders

There are many advantages for funders to working in an embedded way, including: 

  1. A longer time-frame allows for follow-through on changes. Any significant change will only pay off  over the long run.
  2. An array of supports is a better way of building relationships than grants can be on its own
  3. Listening to community voices provides the ability to self-correct.
  4. Trust can provide better leverage towards effective change over the long term than money.

According to Mikael, Humboldt Area Foundation accomplished more community economic development by serving as a trusted neutral convenor than they could have achieved by offering grants.  

The Piton Foundation worked with community groups to push an education reform agenda when the school system was not interested in reform.  When the administration of the education system changed and the Foundation was invited to participate in reform, they had both internal and external leverage.

Some funders have addressed the nature of relationships structurally. They do this by putting community activists on their boards, or by asking active community members to join their staff for a period of time.

Back to top

Challenges

Prue recalls a challenging experience when the Hewlett Foundation evaluated a long-term initiative, but everyone was disappointed with the results. 

The evaluators came to the conclusion that Hewlett failed in two important aspects.  Firstly, the Foundation did not have the ability to form good relationships with a variety of different players. Because the relationships were poor, there was little or no learning.  

In hindsight, Hewlett realized that they should be evaluated too.  The evaluation needed to be candid, with equal exposure to everyone involved. There was no need to do a “show and tell” to impress the funders.  For this kind of evaluation to work, the funders need to invest in the capacity of their partners for self-evaluation.  The evaluator also needs to be an active participant who seeks ways to increase the success of the initiative.  

Back to top.

Questions that Remain 

Prue believes that to realize their potential, philanthropists need to move from grant-making to change-making, and consider the full spectrum of ways they can use their civic influence to create change. 

Back to top.

Links & Resources

Chapin Hall Center for Children - Chapin Hall is a Center for Children at the University of Chicago. Their work concentrates on five primary aspects of children's lives, but has one overarching concern - building knowledge to improve the health and well-being of children. 

Embedded Philanthropy and Community Change - Chapin Hall’s work on embedded philanthropy began in 2003, as an outgrowth of a long-standing research program on philanthropy and community change. This page offers links to a range of their publications. 

Hard Lessons About Philanthropy & Community Change - This report outlines the efforts of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation to help three neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area reduce poverty and develop new leaders, better services, more capable organizations, and stronger connections to resources. 

Communities of Opportunity - This San Francisco-based initiative brings the City, residents of its southeast corner and philanthropic organizations to fundamentally change the way these three groups work together to transform a neighborhood.

Back to top.